Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Blog Article
Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.
refers to regulation that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” offers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how they are applied in certain types of case.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to really make it proper for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision on the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
competent authority and when any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID needed) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts for the purpose of confirming of an individual’s date of birth.
4. It goes without stating that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined on the disposal of instantaneous bail petition.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is effectively-settled that even though looking at the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the advantage of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who're found to become most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed through the respondent department just to extend favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part on the respondent department.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے case law مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.
Please note, If you're seeking a charge exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may well lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence and also the separation of powers.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it can be important that the case established the application from the precautionary principle where there is usually a threat to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power strains.